Texas House Bill HB4728

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/23/09
• Voted on by House: 5/5/09
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/23/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/26/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/31/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to the Parker County Utility District No. 1.

Impact

The bill significantly impacts how utility services are delivered and regulated within Parker County. By outlining specific roles for both public and private entities and establishing distinct operational units within the district, it is expected to streamline the process of service provision. This could lead to improved efficiency in managing water and wastewater services, benefiting residents and businesses alike. Additionally, the bill emphasizes the importance of preserving water quality and sanitary conditions, which is critical for public health and environmental conservation.

Summary

House Bill 4728 relates to the governance and regulation of the Parker County Utility District No. 1. It aims to amend various sections of the Special District Local Laws Code to enhance the district's operational framework. Notable changes include defining new terminologies, such as 'enterprise fund' and 'participant entity', to clarify the roles of different entities involved in the provision of water and wastewater services. The bill also outlines the purposes of the district, which include acquiring and maintaining essential utility facilities to ensure the provision of necessary services to the community.

Contention

Some notable points of contention surrounding HB 4728 may arise from its implications for local governance and control over utility services. While supporters may argue that the bill enhances operational efficiency and service delivery, critics might express concerns that it centralizes utility management too heavily within the district, potentially undermining local inputs and needs. The bill's requirement for customers to secure utility services exclusively from the district could also lead to debates about the adequacy and reliability of available services, especially in areas with alternative providers.