Texas House Bill HB4777

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 5/11/09
• Voted on by House: 5/18/09
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/22/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/27/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/28/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to the creation of the Harris County Improvement District No. 12; providing authority to impose an assessment, impose a tax, and issue bonds.

Impact

If enacted, the bill will enable Harris County to effectively manage local public services, infrastructure, and development projects. Local businesses and residents within the district would potentially benefit from enhanced infrastructure and public services that could foster economic growth and improved community welfare. However, the financial mechanisms such as assessments and taxes imposed by the district may raise concerns among property owners regarding the additional financial burdens imposed on them.

Summary

House Bill 4777 seeks to establish the Harris County Improvement District No. 12, empowering it to impose assessments, taxes, and issue bonds for various public improvements. The bill amends the Special District Local Laws Code to create regulations guiding the governance and operations of the newly formed district. The district is envisioned as a tool to promote not only economic development but also enhance public welfare through improved services and infrastructure. The legislation also details how the district can manage finances, including taxation and generating revenue through bond issuance.

Contention

The bill raises notable concerns regarding local governance and financial accountability, with potential debate around the powers granted to the board of directors governing the district. Critics may view the imposition of taxes and assessments without direct oversight or consent as an overreach of authority. Furthermore, the provision allowing the district to issue bonds and collect taxes could spark discussions regarding taxpayer rights and the management of public funds, particularly if there are perceived risks of mismanagement or lack of transparency in the district's governance.