Texas House Bill HB987

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/2/09
• Voted on by House: 4/15/09
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/11/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/21/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 6/1/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to competitive procurement requirements for local governments.

Impact

The implications of HB 987 are considerable, particularly regarding the procurement protocols within local government entities. By increasing the threshold for competitive bidding, local governments may find it easier to execute contracts without the need for exhaustive bidding processes for smaller projects. This change could potentially expedite project timelines and foster a more flexible environment for local governments to engage vendors effectively. However, there are concerns regarding transparency and accountability in the selection process for contracts that exceed the new threshold.

Summary

House Bill 987 aims to amend existing laws governing competitive procurement and change order requirements specifically for local governments in Texas. The bill proposes a significant increase in the expenditure threshold from $25,000 to $50,000, affecting the manner in which local governments award contracts. This amendment is intended to streamline the procurement process and reduce bureaucratic hurdles, thereby facilitating more efficient management of local contracts and enhancing the overall procurement process.

Contention

The proposed changes have sparked debates among legislators and stakeholders. Proponents argue that raising the threshold encourages efficiency and allows local governments to manage their resources better, responding swiftly to urgent needs without the delays often associated with the competitive bidding process. Conversely, critics raise alarms about the potential for reduced competition and transparency, asserting that such measures could lead to less favorable contract conditions for municipalities. The balance between streamlining processes and ensuring fairness in procurement remains a focal point of contention surrounding this bill.