Texas House Bill HJR112

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/23/09

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment to authorize the imposition of an additional ad valorem tax for emergency services districts, subject to voter approval, at a rate not to exceed five cents for the acquisition of land, equipment, or apparatus or the construction of capital improvements.

Impact

If HJR112 is enacted, it would amend Section 48-e, Article III of the Texas Constitution. The constitutional change would enable emergency services districts to collect additional taxes, hence increasing the financial resources available for crucial emergency services. This amendment could lead to improved services through better equipment, infrastructure, and overall emergency response operations. However, the implementation of this tax would only occur upon approval from the voters residing within the proposed districts, ensuring that local residents have a direct voice in taxing decisions related to their community's emergency services.

Summary

HJR112 proposes a constitutional amendment in Texas to allow the imposition of an additional ad valorem tax for emergency services districts, contingent upon voter approval. This bill seeks to authorize counties to impose a tax rate not exceeding five cents for the acquisition of land, equipment, or apparatus necessary for constructing capital improvements within these districts. The intention behind this measure is to enhance funding for emergency services, which include emergency medical, ambulance, and fire prevention services, thereby aiming to improve public safety and emergency response capabilities.

Contention

One potential point of contention surrounding HJR112 is the notion of additional taxation amidst concerns of fiscal burdens on property owners. Critics may argue that even a small increase in ad valorem tax can significantly impact homeowners and local businesses, particularly in economically challenged areas. On the other hand, supporters of the measure might contend that the investment in emergency services yields substantial long-term benefits and enhances community safety. The necessity of voter approval serves to mediate this contention, as residents will ultimately decide whether the perceived benefits justify the financial implications.