Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB142

Voted on by Senate
 
Out of House Committee
 
Voted on by House
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to certain restrictions on a person who serves as secretary of state.

Impact

The bill also imposes restrictions on the Secretary of State's pecuniary interests by preventing them from having financial ties to the manufacturing or marketing of voting equipment or software. This measure is intended to mitigate conflicts of interest that could arise when the Secretary oversees the election processes while potentially benefitting from the systems in use. Such changes aim to enhance public trust and maintain transparency in Texas's electoral operations.

Summary

Senate Bill 142 is focused on implementing restrictions on individuals who serve as the Secretary of State in Texas, particularly concerning their political engagement and financial interests. The bill stipulates that the Secretary of State is prohibited from participating in any political activities that could aid or defeat a candidate or measure. This includes restrictions on overt political campaigning and lobbying efforts, thereby aiming to uphold the integrity and impartiality expected from the officeholder.

Contention

While the bill's intention is to maintain the integrity of the electoral process, there may be debates surrounding the balance between political involvement and oversight authority. Critics might argue that the restrictions could suppress legitimate expressions of support for candidates or initiatives, while proponents would emphasize the necessity for a neutral and fair electoral administration. Additionally, the specific provision concerning employment restrictions post-tenure may be examined for its potential implications on career opportunities for former Secretaries of State.

Notable points

Overall, Senate Bill 142 represents a significant step towards institutionalizing ethics within the office of the Secretary of State, aiming to reduce both real and perceived conflicts of interest in electoral matters. If enacted, it could set a precedent for stricter oversight of political activities at the state level, reinforcing calls for transparency and accountability in public service.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.