Relating to prohibiting the use of state money or facilities for research involving the destruction of human embryos.
Impact
Should SB1695 be enacted, it will effectively alter the existing landscape of biomedical research in Texas by restricting the areas of study that can be funded with state resources. This could lead to significant implications for institutions that conduct embryonic stem cell research, potentially limiting funding opportunities and advancing alternative research fields that do not involve the destruction of human embryos. The prohibition may also influence research collaborations between state-funded organizations and private entities focused on regenerative medicine and stem cell advances.
Summary
Senate Bill 1695 aims to prohibit the use of state financial resources and state-owned facilities for any research involving the destruction of human embryos, including embryonic stem cell research. This legislation is designed to ensure that public funds and resources are not allocated toward research practices that involve ethical concerns about the destruction of human life at its embryonic stage. The new chapter added to the Health and Safety Code outlines this prohibition clearly, emphasizing the state's stance against such types of research.
Contention
The bill is likely to be a point of contention among lawmakers and within the public discourse, as opinions diverge on the validity and ethical implications of embryonic stem cell research. Proponents argue that this prohibition aligns with ethical principles concerning human life and the potential rights of embryos. Conversely, opponents may contend that restricting such research limits scientific progress and the potential benefits of stem cell therapies for various debilitating health conditions, which could negatively impact public health advancements.
Relating to prohibitions on the use of grant money awarded by the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas to procure or obtain organs from a hospital located in China.
Relating to increasing the criminal penalty for the offense of criminal mischief involving the damage or destruction of a public monument or a place of worship.