Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1714 Compare Versions

The same version is selected twice. Please select two different versions to compare.
OldNewDifferences
11 By: Hegar S.B. No. 1714
22
33
44 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
55 AN ACT
66 relating to evidence of beneficial use and other matters in
77 connection with the issuance of permits by a groundwater
88 conservation district in accordance with its management plan.
99 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
1010 SECTION 1. Section 36.001, Water Code, is amended by adding
1111 Subdivision (28-a) to read as follows:
1212 (28-a) "Evidence of beneficial use" means evidence
1313 that is material and relevant to a determination of the amount of
1414 groundwater that is reasonable for a beneficial use without waste
1515 proposed by a permit applicant consistent with generally accepted
1616 agriculture or industry standards for the proposed type of use and
1717 does not exclude innovations in conservation in agriculture or
1818 industry practices. Evidence of beneficial use that satisfies the
1919 requirements of Subdivision (9)(C) includes evidence that may be in
2020 the form of a:
2121 (A) statutory requirement applicable to an
2222 applicant who is a supplier of water to the public to provide
2323 continuous and adequate water service consistent with the state
2424 water plan; or
2525 (B) contractual obligation applicable to the
2626 applicant for the use of the water based on a demonstrated need for
2727 the water by an end user.
2828 SECTION 2. Subsection (a), Section 36.1071, Water Code, is
2929 amended to read as follows:
3030 (a) Following notice and hearing, the district shall, in
3131 coordination with surface water management entities on a regional
3232 basis, develop a comprehensive management plan which addresses the
3333 following management goals, as applicable:
3434 (1) providing the most efficient use of groundwater;
3535 (2) controlling and preventing waste of groundwater;
3636 (3) controlling and preventing subsidence;
3737 (4) addressing conjunctive surface water management
3838 issues;
3939 (5) addressing natural resource issues;
4040 (6) addressing drought conditions;
4141 (7) addressing conservation, recharge enhancement,
4242 rainwater harvesting, precipitation enhancement, or brush control,
4343 where appropriate and cost-effective; [and]
4444 (8) addressing in a quantitative manner the desired
4545 future conditions of the groundwater resources; and
4646 (9) addressing the ability of the district's
4747 groundwater resources to meet the future water supply needs of the
4848 district.
4949 SECTION 3. Subsection (g), Section 36.1072, Water Code, is
5050 amended to read as follows:
5151 (g) In this subsection, "development board" means the Texas
5252 Water Development Board. A person with a legally defined interest
5353 in groundwater in a district or in the management area in which a
5454 district is located or a [the] regional water planning group
5555 located in the management area may file a petition with the
5656 development board stating that a conflict requiring resolution may
5757 exist between the district's approved management plan developed
5858 under Section 36.1071 and the state water plan. If a conflict
5959 exists, the development board shall provide technical assistance to
6060 and facilitate coordination between the involved person or regional
6161 water planning group and the district to resolve the conflict. Not
6262 later than the 45th day after the date the person or the regional
6363 water planning group files a petition with the development board,
6464 if the conflict has not been resolved, the district and the involved
6565 person or regional planning group may mediate the conflict. The
6666 district and the involved person or regional planning group may
6767 seek the assistance of the Center for Public Policy Dispute
6868 Resolution at The University of Texas School of Law or an
6969 alternative dispute resolution system established under Chapter
7070 152, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, in obtaining a qualified
7171 impartial third party to mediate the conflict. The cost of the
7272 mediation services must be specified in the agreement between the
7373 parties and the Center for Public Policy Dispute Resolution or the
7474 alternative dispute resolution system. If the district and the
7575 involved person or regional planning group cannot resolve the
7676 conflict through mediation, the development board shall resolve the
7777 conflict not later than the 60th day after the date the mediation is
7878 completed. The development board action under this provision may
7979 be consolidated, at the option of the board, with related action
8080 under Section 16.053(p). If the development board determines that
8181 resolution of the conflict requires a revision of the approved
8282 groundwater conservation district management plan, the development
8383 board shall provide information to the district. The district
8484 shall prepare any revisions to the plan based on the information
8585 provided by the development board and shall hold, after notice, at
8686 least one public hearing at some central location within the
8787 district. The district shall consider all public and development
8888 board comments, prepare, revise, and adopt its plan, and submit the
8989 revised plan to the development board for approval. On the request
9090 of the district or the regional water planning group, the
9191 development board shall include discussion of the conflict and its
9292 resolution in the state water plan that the development board
9393 provides to the governor, the lieutenant governor, and the speaker
9494 of the house of representatives under Section 16.051(e). If the
9595 groundwater conservation district disagrees with the decision of
9696 the development board under this subsection, the district may
9797 appeal the decision to a district court in Travis County. Costs
9898 for the appeal shall be set by the court hearing the appeal. An
9999 appeal under this subsection is by trial de novo.
100100 SECTION 4. Subsections (f) and (l), Section 36.108, Water
101101 Code, are amended to read as follows:
102102 (f) A district, regional water planning group dependent on
103103 the groundwater resources in the groundwater management area, or
104104 person with a legally defined interest in the groundwater within
105105 the management area may file a petition with the commission
106106 requesting an inquiry if a district or districts refused to join in
107107 the planning process or the process failed to result in adequate
108108 planning, including the establishment of reasonable future desired
109109 conditions of the aquifers, and the petition provides evidence
110110 that:
111111 (1) a district in the groundwater management area has
112112 failed to adopt rules;
113113 (2) the rules adopted by a district are not designed to
114114 achieve the desired future condition of the groundwater resources
115115 in the groundwater management area established during the joint
116116 planning process;
117117 (3) the groundwater in the management area is not
118118 adequately protected by the rules adopted by a district; or
119119 (4) the groundwater in the groundwater management area
120120 is not adequately protected due to the failure of a district to
121121 enforce substantial compliance with its rules.
122122 (l) A person with a legally defined interest in the
123123 groundwater in the groundwater management area, a district in or
124124 adjacent to the groundwater management area, or a regional water
125125 planning group [for a region] in the groundwater management area to
126126 meet a water management strategy identified in the adopted regional
127127 water plan may file a petition with the development board appealing
128128 the approval of the desired future conditions of the groundwater
129129 resources established under this section. The petition must
130130 provide evidence that the districts did not establish a reasonable
131131 desired future condition of the groundwater resources in the
132132 groundwater management area.
133133 SECTION 5. Section 36.113, Water Code, is amended by adding
134134 Subsection (e-1) to read as follows:
135135 (e-1) A district may not grant a permit unless the applicant
136136 provides evidence of an actual and reasonable beneficial use.
137137 SECTION 6. Section 36.122, Water Code, is amended by
138138 amending Subsection (f) and adding Subsection (r) to read as
139139 follows:
140140 (f) In reviewing a proposed transfer of groundwater out of
141141 the district, the district shall consider:
142142 (1) the availability of water in the district and in
143143 the proposed receiving area during the period for which the water
144144 supply is requested;
145145 (2) the projected effect of the proposed transfer on
146146 aquifer conditions, depletion, subsidence, or effects on existing
147147 permit holders or other groundwater users within the district; and
148148 (3) the approved [regional water plan and certified]
149149 district management plan.
150150 (r) A district may not grant a permit that allows the
151151 transfer of groundwater outside the district unless the applicant
152152 provides evidence of beneficial use as described by Section
153153 36.001(28-a).
154154 SECTION 7. Subsection (e-1), Section 36.113, Water Code, as
155155 added by this Act, and Section 36.122, Water Code, as amended by
156156 this Act, apply only to an application for a permit that is
157157 submitted to a groundwater conservation district on or after the
158158 effective date of this Act. An application submitted before the
159159 effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the
160160 date the application was submitted, and that law continues in
161161 effect for that purpose.
162162 SECTION 8. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives
163163 a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as
164164 provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this
165165 Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this
166166 Act takes effect September 1, 2009.