Texas Senate Bill SB1760

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 4/16/09
• Voted on by Senate: 4/22/09
• Out of House Committee: 5/18/09
• Voted on by House: 5/26/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/29/09
• Vetoed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to the administration of the Texas Save and Match Program to assist qualifying beneficiaries under the state's prepaid tuition plans and college savings plans and to the treatment of a beneficiary's assets under prepaid tuition plans and college savings plans in determining eligibility for student financial assistance and other assistance programs.

Impact

One of the key implications of SB1760 is the exclusion of assets in the matching accounts from consideration when determining eligibility for student financial assistance and other assistance programs. This alleviates potential barriers for families seeking financial aid, ensuring that savings designated for education do not negatively affect a beneficiary's financial aid opportunities. Such measures could broaden access to educational funding for economically disadvantaged families.

Summary

SB1760 focuses on the administration of the Texas Save and Match Program, which is designed to assist beneficiaries under the state's prepaid tuition plans and college savings plans. The bill introduces provisions for how contributions to these programs can be matched, particularly for lower-income families. By establishing a matching account framework based on household income, the bill aims to enhance affordability and access to higher education for qualifying participants.

Contention

While SB1760 has widespread support for its focus on improving access to higher education, there may be concerns regarding the sustainability of the matching program, especially if legislative appropriations fluctuate. Additionally, determining the eligibility criteria and the administrative processes required for verifying beneficiary income levels may lead to discussions about bureaucratic efficiency and the impact of such criteria on participation rates. Moreover, some stakeholders might question whether the matching ratios effectively promote equity among beneficiaries coming from varying economic backgrounds.