Texas Senate Bill SB1799

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Caption

Relating to the adoption of rules by the supreme court relating to the nonrenewal of the license of an attorney who defaults on a student loan administered by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.

Impact

If enacted, SB1799 would result in significant changes to the regulatory landscape governing the legal profession in Texas. It would specifically amend Section 82.022 of the Government Code, allowing the Supreme Court the authority to adopt rules that enforce nonrenewal of an attorney's license under certain financial circumstances. The implications of this legislation could enhance the financial accountability of legal professionals, thereby possibly reducing instances of default among practicing attorneys as they might prioritize loan repayment to ensure they can retain their licenses.

Summary

Senate Bill 1799 seeks to empower the Texas Supreme Court to create rules regarding the nonrenewal of licenses for attorneys who default on student loans administered by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. This proposal aims to establish a direct connection between the obligation of attorneys to repay educational loans and their ability to practice law within the state. By introducing such a regulation, the bill addresses the growing concerns over defaulted loans and the accountability of legal professionals in maintaining their licensure.

Contention

There may be various points of contention surrounding SB1799, particularly regarding the fairness and implications of tying loan repayment to professional licensure. Supporters might argue that this is a necessary measure to uphold standards within the legal community, promoting financial responsibility among attorneys. Conversely, opponents could raise concerns about the potential negative impact on individuals struggling with financial hardship who may be disproportionately affected by such regulations. Critics might also worry that this law could deter entry into the legal profession for those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds who already face challenges in affording legal education.