Texas Senate Bill SB1816

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 5/5/09

Caption

Relating to the pilot program for reporting of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Impact

The enactment of SB1816 will directly influence the state's health regulations by formalizing reporting procedures for MRSA. This measure is designed to track MRSA prevalence more efficiently and develop strategies for its management. Furthermore, the program requires clinical laboratories within the participating health authorities to automate and securely report positive MRSA cases, thereby fostering better data collection practices and facilitating informed public health responses. An evaluation of the program's effectiveness in controlling MRSA infections will be conducted biennially, ensuring that the legislation adapts to emerging health trends.

Summary

Senate Bill 1816 pertains to the establishment of a reporting program for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections within Texas. The legislation mandates the executive commissioner of the Health and Human Services Commission to develop a structured program aimed at documenting and analyzing MRSA cases. While participation in this program isn't compulsory for local health authorities, those that opt-in are tasked with managing the program's local implementation. This initiative seeks to enhance the data surrounding MRSA, a significant public health concern due to its resistance to common antibiotics.

Contention

Throughout the legislative discussions, notable points of contention emerged surrounding the program's implications for local health authorities. There are concerns regarding the program's resource intensity and potential burdens on smaller health departments that may not have the necessary infrastructure for robust reporting. Additionally, some members expressed apprehension about whether this reporting program could indeed translate into effective infection control measures. The requirement for electronic reporting could pose challenges for facilities lacking adequate technological resources, leading to debates over equitable implementation across varying local contexts.