Texas Senate Bill SB1966

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 4/2/09
• Voted on by Senate: 4/16/09
• Out of House Committee: 4/27/09
• Voted on by House: 4/30/09
• Governor Action: 5/23/09
• Enrolled: 5/12/09
• Passed: 5/23/09

Caption

Relating to debt cancellation agreements offered in connection with motor vehicle retail installment contracts.

Impact

The bill amends the Finance Code, creating more clarity on how debt cancellation agreements should be implemented in retail transactions, particularly those involving motor vehicles. By doing so, it enhances consumer protection measures, ensuring that any charge associated with debt cancellation agreements must be reasonable and disclosed adequately. This helps to prevent potential exploitation of consumers who might be coerced into buying unnecessary agreements that do not benefit them.

Summary

SB1966 introduces regulations surrounding debt cancellation agreements in connection with retail installment contracts specifically for motor vehicles. The bill defines a debt cancellation agreement as a contractual arrangement whereby the seller agrees to cancel all or part of a buyer's obligation under certain circumstances, such as total loss or theft of the vehicle. This aspect aims to protect consumers by ensuring that they are not obligated to pay more than what is reasonable when unforeseen events occur with the financed vehicle.

Contention

While the bill seems to have garnered broad support as indicated by its voting history, notable concerns revolve around the implications for transparency in financial transactions. There may be apprehensions regarding whether the bill does enough to inform buyers about their rights concerning debt cancellation agreements, especially in a sector often viewed as prone to predatory practices. Critics may argue that despite the intentions of the bill, not all retailers will comply with the regulations if there are insufficient enforcement mechanisms.

Overall_reception

The legislative journey of SB1966 appears to reflect an understanding of the need for reform in the consumer finance sector, particularly addressing issues related to retail installment contracts. With unanimous votes favoring the bill in both the Senate and House, it suggests a consensus on the importance of safeguarding consumer rights in the context of automotive financing.