Texas Senate Bill SB2511

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 5/1/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/12/09
• Out of House Committee: 5/20/09
• Voted on by House: 5/26/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/27/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to the creation of Chambers County Improvement District No. 2; providing authority to levy an assessment, impose a tax, and issue bonds; granting a limited power of eminent domain.

Impact

The bill will significantly alter state laws regarding the establishment and operation of improvement districts. It provides the legal tools necessary for the Chambers County Improvement District No. 2 to impose taxes on properties within its boundaries, facilitating funding for local improvements such as roads, drainage, and recreational facilities. The bill also ensures that the district functions in conjunction with existing municipal services, thus promoting cooperation between local government entities and enhancing the overall service provision in the community.

Summary

SB2511 proposes the establishment of the Chambers County Improvement District No. 2, which aims to enhance local economic development by allowing the district to levy assessments, impose taxes, issue bonds, and exercise limited powers of eminent domain. This legal framework seeks to support infrastructure development that fosters employment, commerce, and public welfare within the district. By creating this improvement district, the bill outlines the mechanisms through which the district can raise funds and manage services essential for community growth.

Contention

A notable point of contention within SB2511 lies in its provision for limited eminent domain powers. While the district can exercise eminent domain for public purposes, there may be concerns from property owners about potential impacts on their rights. The provision to levy taxes and assessments also raises questions about the financial burden on local residents, especially in times of economic uncertainty. Furthermore, the necessity for municipal consent for the district’s establishment can create friction between the district and local governments, potentially complicating the bill's implementation.