Texas Senate Bill SB2512

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 5/1/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/12/09
• Out of House Committee: 5/20/09
• Voted on by House: 5/27/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/28/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to the creation of the Chambers County Improvement District No. 3; granting road powers; providing authority to impose a tax and issue bonds; granting a limited power of eminent domain.

Impact

The bill aims to enhance transportation infrastructure within the specified boundaries of Chambers County, positively impacting local development and community connectivity. By creating a formal improvement district, SB2512 seeks to ensure that necessary roadworks and upgrades are executed efficiently, which can benefit residents through improved access and potentially increased property values. Moreover, the structure of governance as defined in the bill establishes elected directors, ensuring local representation in the decision-making process regarding public works.

Summary

SB2512 pertains to the establishment of the Chambers County Improvement District No. 3, which has the primary function of managing and facilitating various local public works projects. Specifically, the bill provides the district with authority over road construction and improvement initiatives, enabling it to design, construct, and maintain roadways and related infrastructure. This legislation also empowers the district to impose taxes and issue bonds, providing a financial framework to support these projects, contingent upon the approval of local voters for certain financial initiatives.

Contention

However, establishing such districts and granting them powers does not come without challenges. Notable points of contention may include concerns over taxation—especially the imposition of maintenance taxes and property taxes that could arise from bond issuances. Residents may be apprehensive about any increased financial burden on property owners within the district. Additionally, the use of eminent domain for project purposes could lead to disputes if property owners oppose the acquisition of land or easements, even if the stated public benefit appears significant.