Texas Senate Bill SB2554

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 4/30/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/5/09
• Out of House Committee: 5/21/09
• Voted on by House: 5/27/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/28/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to a bailiff for the 130th District Court.

Impact

The proposed changes in SB2554 will directly amend several existing sections of the Government Code, particularly those that govern the eligibility and allocation of salaries for bailiffs. By specifying that bailiffs must be residents of the county where they serve and setting age requirements, the bill emphasizes accountability and local representation within the judicial system. Additionally, it ensures that bailiffs receive compensation that is commensurate with their responsibilities by tying their salaries to that of deputy sheriffs, which could improve recruitment and retention in this role.

Summary

SB2554 is a legislative bill pertaining to the appointment of bailiffs in the 130th Judicial District. The bill specifically amends the Texas Government Code to outline the criteria and authority under which judges of various district courts, including the 130th, can appoint bailiffs. This aims to clarify existing procedures and ensure that the appointments are aligned with current governance structures. By establishing a framework for who may serve as a bailiff, the bill seeks to enhance the functionality and administrative efficiency of court operations.

Contention

While the text of SB2554 primarily details adjustments to administrative procedures, possible points of contention may arise during discussions regarding salary specifications and the impact of residency requirements on the pool of eligible candidates. Stakeholders might debate the effectiveness of tying bailiff salaries to deputy sheriffs, with some arguing for or against this approach based on budget implications for county finances. Furthermore, the necessity of setting rigid eligibility criteria may raise concerns about potential restrictions on qualified individuals who might overlook the residency requirement.