Texas Senate Bill SB256

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Filed: 11/10/08
• Out of Senate Committee: 4/20/09
• Voted on by Senate: 4/29/09
• Out of House Committee: 5/13/09
• Voted on by House: 5/15/09
• Governor Action: 5/27/09
• Enrolled: 5/18/09
• Passed: 5/27/09

Caption

Relating to an intercollegiate athletics fee at Midwestern State University.

Impact

The bill impacts state laws by amending the Education Code to include provisions for this specific fee structure. The revenue generated from the fee is designated solely for athletics programs, thereby ensuring that resources are directed towards enhancing the university's sports facilities and teams. Additionally, the legislation stipulates that any increase in the fee will not exceed 10 percent per academic year unless approved by a majority vote in a general student election, ensuring that student voices remain central to the decision-making process regarding their financial contributions.

Summary

SB256 is a legislative measure concerning the imposition of an intercollegiate athletics fee at Midwestern State University. It allows the university's board of regents to charge each enrolled student a fee not exceeding $10 per semester credit hour, with a maximum of $120 for regular semesters and $60 for shorter summer sessions. The intention behind this bill is to establish a sustainable funding source specifically aimed at developing and maintaining the university's intercollegiate athletics programs, which are essential for enhancing the campus’s student life and competitive sports infrastructure.

Contention

The legislation may raise discussions surrounding the balance of financial responsibilities between students and the university. While proponents argue that investing in athletics enriches the university experience and promotes school spirit, critics may question the fairness of imposing additional financial burdens on students, particularly those already facing rising tuition and fee costs. The requirement for majority student approval for fee increases also introduces an element of direct democracy, which may foster engagement among the student population but could also serve as a potential barrier to necessary funding enhancements in the future.