Texas Senate Bill SB585

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 4/15/09
• Voted on by Senate: 4/23/09
• Out of House Committee: 5/15/09
• Voted on by House: 5/26/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/26/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to standards of conduct and ethics policies for metropolitan planning organizations.

Impact

The implementation of SB585 is expected to bolster ethical governance within metropolitan planning organizations throughout Texas. By mandating that each MPO adopt bylaws reflecting the new standards of conduct, the legislation aims to unify expectations regarding ethical behavior across various organizations. This will enable better oversight and transparency in MPO operations, which is critical in planning and development processes that affect local communities and infrastructure.

Summary

SB585 proposes to amend the Transportation Code concerning standards of conduct and ethics policies for members and employees of metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs). The bill establishes clear guidelines to prevent conflicts of interest and outline unacceptable behaviors related to gifts, employment, and investments that could impair judgment or create substantial conflicts. These amendments aim at enhancing accountability and integrity within MPOs, ensuring that their members act without bias and in the best interest of the public they serve.

Conclusion

Ultimately, if enacted, SB585 would signify an important step toward greater accountability in the operations of metropolitan planning organizations in Texas. By establishing clear ethical boundaries, the bill seeks to reinforce public trust in the entities responsible for critical urban planning decisions while allowing for the promotion of transparent and fair practices within public governance.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB585 revolve around the balance between strict ethical guidelines and the practical implications for members and employees of MPOs. Some stakeholders may argue that while the intent of the bill is commendable, overly stringent regulations could hinder effective decision-making and discourage qualified individuals from participating in MPOs due to fear of potential violations. There is also concern over the enforcement of these standards and how they might impact the hiring and operational procedures of MPOs, particularly in smaller regions with limited resources.