Texas Senate Bill SB588

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 4/17/09
• Voted on by Senate: 4/30/09
• Out of House Committee: 5/6/09
• Voted on by House: 5/25/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/26/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to the creation of the Waller County Municipal Utility District No. 9; providing authority to impose a tax and issue bonds; granting a limited power of eminent domain.

Impact

The creation of the Waller County Municipal Utility District No. 9 would specifically impact state laws regarding municipal utility districts and their governance. It allows for a localized approach to public utilities, which can potentially streamline the process for residents to access essential services. Furthermore, the district could generate revenue through taxes and bond issues, which would foster further infrastructure development within its jurisdiction. This could lead to enhanced property values and local economic growth, particularly in areas needing significant improvements in road infrastructure.

Summary

Senate Bill 588 proposes the establishment of the Waller County Municipal Utility District No. 9, which includes provisions for the district to impose taxes, issue bonds, and exercise a limited power of eminent domain. The main objectives of the bill are to provide necessary utilities and infrastructure improvements in the district to serve its residents. This includes the construction and maintenance of roads and the necessary drainage systems associated with these projects. The bill is structured to ensure that any initiatives launched under this district adhere to existing state laws and municipal regulations.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding SB588 may be its provisions related to the power of eminent domain. While the bill allows the district to exercise limited eminent domain powers, concerns could arise regarding the potential confiscation of private property for public utility projects. Stakeholders may have diverse opinions on the balance between community development and individual property rights. Moreover, the requirement for municipal consent before district formation might raise discussions around local government authority and autonomy in managing utility provisions.