Texas Senate Bill SB660

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 4/17/09
• Voted on by Senate: 4/30/09
• Out of House Committee: 5/15/09
• Voted on by House: 5/25/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/29/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to the creation of the Caldwell County Municipal Utility District No. 1; providing authority to impose a tax and issue bonds; granting a limited power of eminent domain.

Impact

The establishment of this municipal utility district is expected to streamline the provision of utilities and infrastructure in Caldwell County, addressing growth needs in the area. The district will have the power to manage local utilities effectively while facilitating improvements to public road systems. This legislation reflects a move towards localized governance in utility management, potentially enhancing coordination between services provided across different jurisdictions within Caldwell County.

Summary

SB660 proposes the creation of the Caldwell County Municipal Utility District No. 1. This new district is designed under Texas law to serve the public purpose of facilitating urban development and utility services in Caldwell County. The bill grants the district authority to impose taxes and issue bonds as necessary to accomplish its objectives, which include the construction, maintenance, and operation of essential infrastructure such as roads and drainage systems. Additionally, the bill enables the district to levy property taxes, pending voter approval, to fund various projects and services.

Contention

A point of contention surrounding SB660 is related to the limited power of eminent domain granted to the district. While promoting development, the use of eminent domain can lead to disputes concerning property rights and local resident opposition. The bill stipulates that eminent domain powers are confined within the borders of the district, which aims to minimize controversy; however, concerns remain about how property rights will be balanced against the need for infrastructure development. Moreover, the need for municipal consent for district formation highlights the potential for tension between local governments and the new district's authority.