Texas Senate Bill SB816

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of Senate Committee: 4/16/09
• Voted on by Senate: 4/21/09

Caption

Relating to the Texas Teach Corps Student Loan Repayment Assistance Program for undergraduate students who agree to teach in school districts in this state that have shortages of teachers in mathematics or science.

Impact

If enacted, the bill is expected to amend the Texas Education Code by introducing provisions specific to the scholarship program, including eligibility criteria, financial limits, and repayment conditions. The scholarships are limited to a total amount of $5,000 per academic year, encouraging students to commit to teaching in areas of need. Furthermore, the bill outlines a forgiveness plan where recipients can have a percentage of their scholarship forgiven for each complete year of teaching service in the required subjects, providing an economic incentive for sustained employment in these challenging roles.

Summary

SB816 establishes the Texas Teach Corps Scholarship Program aimed at addressing teacher shortages in mathematics and science across public schools in Texas. The bill seeks to incentivize undergraduate students enrolled in educator preparation programs by providing scholarships to cover tuition costs in exchange for their commitment to teach in schools identified as having shortages in these subject areas. This initiative is designed to promote education in vital STEM fields and to mitigate the ongoing challenge of finding qualified educators in subjects essential for students' academic success.

Contention

Discussion surrounding SB816 may focus on potential issues related to its implementation and effectiveness in meeting actual teacher shortages. Critics might argue whether scholarship amounts and terms are sufficient to attract the necessary number of qualified graduates to under-resourced schools. Additionally, some may express concerns regarding the long-term sustainability of the funding for these scholarships, especially if they are linked to fluctuating state budgets. Defining specific schools facing shortages, and ensuring equitable access to the program across different geographic and demographic areas, may also be areas of contention.