Texas Senate Bill SJR33

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to exempt from ad valorem taxation the residence homestead of the surviving spouse of a 100 percent or totally disabled veteran or the principal place of residence of the surviving minor children of such a disabled veteran in an amount equal to the amount of the residence homestead exemption to which the disabled veteran was entitled on the same property.

Impact

If enacted, this constitutional amendment would directly impact state laws regarding ad valorem taxation by establishing an exemption that could ease the financial burdens on families of disabled veterans. The provision would allow surviving spouses and minor children to benefit from the same property tax exemptions that were available to the disabled veteran, thereby supporting these families in maintaining stability in their housing situation. This could influence local government revenues dependent on property taxes but aims to promote welfare for the families involved.

Summary

SJR33 is a proposed constitutional amendment that seeks to authorize the Texas legislature to provide property tax exemptions for the residence homesteads of the surviving spouses and minor children of 100 percent or totally disabled veterans. The bill proposes that these survivors will be eligible for an exemption equivalent to that which the deceased veteran was entitled to on the same property. The intent behind this amendment is to provide financial relief to families of disabled veterans who may face economic challenges due to the loss of the veteran, thus making it feasible for them to retain their homes.

Contention

The discussions surrounding SJR33 may involve points of contention such as the fiscal impact on local government budgets and the broader implications of tax exemptions. Proponents likely argue that this amendment will ensure a level of protection and assistance for families of disabled veterans, acknowledging their service and sacrifices. Conversely, opponents might raise concerns about potential revenue losses for municipalities, suggesting that while the emotional and ethical motivations are strong, the financial ramifications on local budgets should be scrutinized.