Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB1033

Filed
 
Introduced
1/31/11  
Out of House Committee
4/21/11  
Voted on by House
5/6/11  
Refer
2/28/11  
Out of Senate Committee
5/20/11  
Report Pass
4/14/11  
Voted on by Senate
5/25/11  
Engrossed
5/6/11  
Governor Action
6/17/11  
Refer
5/9/11  
Bill Becomes Law
 
Report Pass
5/20/11  
Enrolled
5/26/11  
Enrolled
5/26/11  
Passed
6/17/11  

Caption

Relating to the authority of certain counties to impose a county hotel occupancy tax.

Note

The bill requires a two-thirds vote for immediate effect; otherwise, it will take effect on September 1, 2011. This aspect indicates the legislature's urgency in implementing the changes, presumably to coincide with tourism seasons.

Impact

The implementation of HB1033 means a potential increase in local revenues for qualifying small counties, which may assist in funding local services and initiatives. It recognizes the unique economic situations of smaller counties and attempts to empower them within the broader Texas taxation structure. Additionally, the ability to levy this tax could attract more tourism revenue to these counties, which might be used to improve infrastructure, services, or promotional activities aimed at boosting tourism.

Summary

House Bill 1033 addresses the authority of certain counties in Texas to impose a hotel occupancy tax. Specifically, the bill allows counties with a population of less than 8,000, which border the Pecos River and another county with a population over 120,000, to impose such a tax. This measure is aimed at providing these smaller counties with a new revenue-generating tool, particularly those that may rely on tourism or have limited economic resources. The tax imposition would not apply to hotels within municipalities that already impose their own hotel occupancy taxes.

Contention

As with any tax-related legislation, there could be areas of contention regarding the fairness and implications of imposing a new tax, particularly how it might affect hotel prices and the potential burden on local businesses. Larger counties or municipalities may view this as a competitive disadvantage, especially if they already implement higher tax rates. Opponents could argue that it might lead to disparity between tourist destinations that can impose such taxes and those that cannot, thus impacting the overall economic landscape.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.