Texas House Bill HB1039

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 1/31/11
• Refer: 2/28/11

Caption

Relating to death benefits for eligible survivors of certain Texas National Guard members.

Impact

If passed, the bill would amend existing laws to ensure that families of fallen Texas National Guard members receive financial support that reflects their sacrifice for the state and country. The proposed benefits are designed to be in addition to any other state or federal benefits already available, ensuring that survivors have the necessary resources to support themselves during challenging times. Furthermore, the Adjutant General will administer the program, outlining the eligibility requirements and procedures for claiming benefits, thereby adding a layer of administrative oversight.

Summary

House Bill 1039 proposes significant amendments to the Texas Government Code, specifically aimed at providing death benefits to the eligible survivors of certain Texas National Guard members. This bill outlines that eligible survivors are those connected to Texas National Guard members who died while on active duty either under federal authority or during state military operations after September 11, 2001. The bill stipulates that these survivors would be eligible for a death benefit of $250,000, which is intended to assist families during the transition period following the loss of their loved ones in service.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding HB 1039 appears overwhelmingly positive among legislators and military communities. Supporters believe that providing these benefits is a necessary recognition of the sacrifices made by Texas National Guard members and their families. This bill is framed as a moral duty, aligning with the state's commitment to support its servicemembers. The passage of the bill could serve to foster a sense of community and respect for those who serve in the national defense.

Contention

One notable point of contention could arise surrounding the funding for these benefits, as the bill states that payments are contingent upon specific appropriations by the legislature. This raises questions about the state's budget priorities, especially in times of financial constraint. Additionally, while the benefits are broadly supported, discussions may emerge regarding the adequacy of the proposed amount in meeting the actual needs of eligible survivors, considering the potential long-term impacts of losing a primary income provider.