Relating to the control of emissions from crude oil and condensate storage tanks in certain areas of this state.
If enacted, HB1126 would amend the Texas Health and Safety Code by adding provisions that dictate how emissions should be controlled from certain storage tanks. This includes the requirement for storage tanks operational before September 2012 to limit emissions to less than 10 tons of VOCs annually, while newer tanks must not exceed 5 tons. Additionally, vapor recovery systems must achieve a minimum of 95 percent efficiency in controlling emissions. This bill mirrors growing concerns regarding air quality and public health, particularly in areas facing high traffic from oil and gas extraction activities.
House Bill 1126 focuses on the regulation of emissions from crude oil and condensate storage tanks in specific areas of Texas. This legislation aims to require owners or operators of these tanks to implement measures to control emissions, particularly volatile organic compounds (VOCs). It targets storage tanks or tank batteries located in counties that are partially above hydrocarbon-producing geological formations and have populations exceeding 1.4 million. The intent of the bill is to enhance air quality and mitigate environmental impacts arising from oil and gas operations in densely populated regions.
Discussion around HB1126 may reflect a generally positive sentiment among environmental advocates and public health officials, who view the bill as a necessary step towards stricter environmental controls and air quality improvements. Conversely, industry stakeholders may express concerns regarding the potential financial and operational impact of these new regulations. The sentiment is likely to hinge on the balance between environmental protection and economic viability within the oil and gas sector.
Notable points of contention could arise surrounding the practicality and economic implications of implementing vapor recovery systems and the potential for operational alterations that industry players will need to adopt. Some may argue that such regulations could impose an undue burden on smaller operations or lead to increased costs that could be passed on to consumers. The discussions around the bill are expected to involve debates about environmental responsibility versus economic impacts, especially in a state known for its substantial oil production.