Texas House Bill HB1160

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 2/7/11
• Refer: 3/1/11

Caption

Relating to certification to teach public school students who have visual impairments.

Impact

The enactment of HB 1160 is expected to enhance the quality of education for students with visual impairments by ensuring that educators possess the necessary training and qualifications. This bill addresses a crucial need for specialized educators in public schools and aims to narrow the gap in educational equity for students with specific learning needs. Furthermore, the certification process defined in this bill is intended to foster more effective teaching strategies tailored to this unique student population.

Summary

House Bill 1160 aims to establish clear requirements for the certification of educators who teach students with visual impairments in Texas public schools. This bill proposes the addition of Section 21.0485 to the Education Code, which delineates the criteria necessary for aspiring teachers to obtain their certification. Key elements of the certification process include completion of the required coursework in an approved educator preparation program or an alternative educator certification program, successful passage of prescribed examinations, and adherence to any additional requirements set forth by the board.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB 1160 appears to be positive among members of the committee discussing education. Advocates argue that the bill is a necessary step forward in supporting teachers and ensuring that students with visual impairments receive appropriate instruction. However, some concerns may arise regarding the impact of additional certification requirements on current teachers looking to specialize without prior formal training in teaching students with disabilities.

Contention

While there is overall support for the objectives of HB 1160, the discussion may highlight contention related to the practical implications of implementing the new certification standards. Stakeholders might debate the adequacy of currently available educator preparation programs and whether the proposed standards could inadvertently limit access to teaching opportunities for candidates who perform well in practice but may struggle with standardized testing requirements. This reflects broader concerns in the education community about balancing rigorous qualifications with inclusive access to teaching positions.