Texas House Bill HB1235

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 2/10/11
• Out of House Committee: 4/11/11
• Voted on by House: 4/27/11
• Refer: 3/1/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/17/11
• Report Pass: 4/6/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/24/11
• Engrossed: 4/27/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 5/2/11
• Report Pass: 5/17/11
• Enrolled: 5/26/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to the transfer of certain state property from the Texas Department of Transportation to the Parks and Wildlife Department.

Impact

The ramifications of this bill could be significant for local recreational resources. By facilitating the transfer of state property, HB1235 aims to enhance public park accessibility within Williamson County, potentially improving community health and well-being through increased outdoor activities. The bill emphasizes the importance of maintaining the property as a public park, reinforcing the state's responsibilities towards the conservation of public spaces.

Summary

House Bill 1235 initiates the transfer of a specific tract of land from the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to the Parks and Wildlife Department. This transfer is mandated to occur by December 31, 2011, and the land is to be utilized exclusively for public park purposes. Should the Parks and Wildlife Department cease to use the land for such purposes, ownership will revert back to TxDOT automatically. The bill outlines specific provisions that govern both the use of the land and the conditions under which it may be leased or returned.

Contention

While the bill appears to support community interests by enriching public park facilities, discussions around the bill may have uncovered concerns regarding the financial implications for both the Parks and Wildlife Department and TxDOT. It is vital to consider whether adequate funds or resources are available for the maintenance of the new public park and how this transfer might affect the existing obligations of both departments to manage state properties effectively. Additionally, stakeholders may raise questions about the long-term sustainability of utilizing the property strictly as a public park.