Texas House Bill HB1241

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/20/11
• Introduced: 2/10/11
• Voted on by House: 5/13/11
• Refer: 3/1/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/21/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/24/11
• Engrossed: 5/13/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 5/13/11
• Report Pass: 5/21/11
• Enrolled: 5/25/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to surety bond requirements for reserve deputy constables.

Impact

The bill introduces a provision allowing constables who appoint multiple reserve deputy constables the option to implement a blanket surety bond, which would cover all reserve deputies simultaneously. This change could reduce the administrative burden on local governments and make it easier for constables to manage their reserve deputies by simplifying the bond process. Alternatively, counties are given the authority to self-insure against potential losses instead of executing individual bonds. This flexibility aims to address the varying financial capacities and preferences of different counties throughout Texas.

Summary

House Bill 1241 proposes significant changes to the surety bond requirements for reserve deputy constables in Texas. Under current law, each reserve deputy constable is required to execute an individual bond amounting to $2,000 payable to their respective constable. This requirement ensures that there is a measure of financial accountability and protection in place for the actions of reserve deputy constables, who serve under the oversight of duly appointed constables within their counties.

Contention

The discussions surrounding HB 1241 may touch upon notable points of contention, particularly regarding the accountability mechanisms for reserve deputy constables. While supporters may argue that the changes streamline operations and reduce costs for local entities, critics may raise concerns that blanket bonds or self-insurance could lead to lesser accountability for reserve deputies. The balance between ensuring sufficient oversight of reserve deputies and allowing for more efficient operational practices for law enforcement agencies will likely be a key topic of debate as the bill progresses.