Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB1292

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to coverage of certain eating disorders as serious mental illnesses under certain group health benefit plans.

Impact

The bill is expected to enhance the protections afforded to individuals dealing with eating disorders by mandating insurance coverage. This means that plans must now recognize these disorders as serious mental illnesses as defined by the American Psychiatric Association. The broader implication of this legislation is the potential to improve access to treatment for eating disorders, which can often be overlooked or inadequately addressed in traditional healthcare frameworks. Such coverage is crucial for facilitating early intervention and long-term recovery for affected individuals.

Summary

House Bill 1292 seeks to amend the Insurance Code to classify certain eating disorders, specifically anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa, as serious mental illnesses. This classification allows individuals suffering from these conditions to receive insurance coverage under group health benefit plans, thereby ensuring they have access to necessary treatment. The bill underlines the importance of recognizing eating disorders within the broader context of mental health and aims to improve the health outcomes for those affected by these conditions by providing better support through insurance benefits.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1292 appears to be supportive among mental health advocates and healthcare professionals who view the bill as a positive step toward recognizing and addressing the complexities of eating disorders. However, there may be pushback from insurance companies concerned about the cost implications of extending coverage, particularly in an industry where profit margins can be thin. Overall, supporters advocate for the necessity of this coverage as a means of combating the stigma associated with mental health disorders and promoting equitable treatment solutions.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support, it is not without contention. Some may argue that mandating insurance coverage for eating disorders could lead to increased premiums for consumers, which could impact overall healthcare costs. Additionally, concerns have been raised about the adequacy of treatment options available for those covered under such plans. The balancing act involves ensuring that individuals can access appropriate care while also considering the financial implications for both providers and insurers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.