Texas House Bill HB1593

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 2/21/11
• Out of House Committee: 4/5/11
• Voted on by House: 4/27/11
• Refer: 3/3/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/17/11
• Report Pass: 3/30/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/24/11
• Engrossed: 4/27/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 5/3/11
• Report Pass: 5/17/11
• Enrolled: 5/24/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to the inclusion of a candidate's e-mail address on an official application for a place on the ballot.

Impact

The inclusion of an email address on ballot applications is expected to foster better communication between candidates and voters. By providing another method for constituents to reach out to their representatives, the bill promotes engagement in the political process. This action aligns with broader efforts to modernize election practices, making it more convenient for voters to connect with potential elected officials. As such, it could lead to an increase in the accountability of candidates as communication channels become more direct and accessible.

Summary

House Bill 1593 aims to amend the Election Code in Texas by requiring the inclusion of a candidate's email address on the official application form for a place on the ballot. This change is intended to enhance transparency in the electoral process, allowing constituents easier access to candidates' contact information. This amendment underscores the modernizing efforts of the electoral process, reflecting the communication preferences of a digital age. The bill was reported favorably by the committee and appears to have broad support within the legislative body, as indicated by its unanimous reporting.

Contention

While the bill received support, there are potential points of contention regarding privacy and the voluntary nature of providing contact information, as candidates are informed that furnishing this information is optional. Some members may express concerns about candidates' reluctance to provide personal contact information due to issues related to privacy and security. The debate surrounding the balance between transparency and privacy could emerge as a critical discussion point during further legislative scrutiny.