Texas House Bill HB1629

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/21/11

Caption

Relating to energy efficiency goals and programs, public information regarding energy efficiency programs, and the participation of loads in certain energy markets.

Impact

This bill acknowledges the vital need for improved energy management within the state's electric utilities by mandating them to report on their energy efficiency goals annually. The introduction of Section 39.9054 adds a requirement for utilities to produce an accessible public report that outlines their performances and plans concerning energy efficiency. This move is intended to foster transparency and allow customers to make informed decisions based on available programs and services, thereby promoting broader participation in efficiency initiatives and ultimately leading to a reduction in energy costs for consumers.

Summary

House Bill 1629 aims to enhance energy efficiency standards and programs across Texas's electric utilities. The bill stipulates that electric utilities must administer energy efficiency incentive programs in a manner that is market-neutral and nondiscriminatory. It emphasizes that all customers should have access to energy efficiency alternatives, thus driving participation in energy conservation initiatives aimed at reducing overall energy consumption, particularly during peak demand periods. Furthermore, it lays out specific targets for energy savings that utilities must meet over the years, ensuring they are incentivized to maintain and improve upon these standards.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise regarding the implementation details of these programs and the thresholds set for participation and compliance. Concerns may be raised about how strictly these goals will be monitored and enforced, as well as the potential financial burdens on electric utilities and how these may affect customer rates. The requirement for utilities to develop competitive programs in competitive markets also suggests that large variances in program success could emerge based on geographic and market conditions, potentially leading to disparities in service performance across the state.