Texas House Bill HB1721

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/19/11
• Introduced: 2/23/11
• Voted on by House: 4/27/11
• Refer: 3/3/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/21/11
• Report Pass: 4/18/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/25/11
• Engrossed: 4/27/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 5/3/11
• Enrolled: 5/27/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to protective orders for certain victims of stalking or sexual assault.

Impact

The impact of HB 1721 extends to both legal procedures and victim support frameworks. By introducing the ability for courts to issue protective orders based on probable cause rather than solely requiring evidence of family violence, this bill broadens the scope of protection for victims. It aims to encourage more victims to come forward and seek legal protections, thereby enhancing their safety. Additionally, amendments regarding the admissibility of hearsay statements from child victims further enhance legal procedures surrounding sensitive cases involving minors, potentially making it easier for children to testify about their experiences without facing the trauma of recounting details in a court setting.

Summary

House Bill 1721 is a legislative proposal that addresses the creation and enforcement of protective orders specifically for victims of stalking and sexual assault. The bill amends the Code of Criminal Procedure by adding provisions that allow for the issuance of protective orders in cases related to offenses under Section 42.072 of the Penal Code. By enabling individuals in such cases to apply for a protective order directly in court, the legislation seeks to provide timely protection against potential harm from offenders. This streamlines the process for victims, ensuring their safety is prioritized during legal proceedings.

Contention

Despite its intent to bolster victim protections, HB 1721 may face scrutiny and debate surrounding its implementation and effectiveness. Proponents argue it is a necessary legal reform that aligns with modern understandings of victim rights and safety. However, opponents might raise concerns about how the new provisions are enforced and whether they adequately address the broader issues of victim support and rehabilitation. The changes to evidentiary standards for child victims also present a point of contention, necessitating careful consideration of the implications for legal processes involving vulnerable individuals.