Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB1755

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the authority of a groundwater conservation district to adopt different rules for the management of groundwater resources located in different areas of the district.

Impact

The passage of HB1755 would lead to significant changes in state laws governing groundwater management by formally recognizing and supporting localized decision-making in groundwater conservation . This tailored approach is designed to ensure that management practices reflect the distinct geological and hydrological conditions present in different areas, which can enhance resource conservation efforts and accommodate varying levels of groundwater availability. Furthermore, districts would be empowered to consider local economic development when establishing groundwater use rules, encouraging a more holistic view of resource management in relation to local growth.

Summary

House Bill 1755 addresses the management of groundwater resources in the state of Texas by granting groundwater conservation districts the authority to implement differentiated rules for various areas within their jurisdiction. The primary intent of the bill is to acknowledge that different regions may have unique groundwater conditions and needs, enabling districts to adapt their management strategies accordingly. By allowing tailored regulations for each aquifer or subdivision, the bill aims to enhance the sustainability and efficiency of water resource management statewide.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB1755 appears to lean towards a positive perspective, particularly from those involved in groundwater conservation efforts. Advocates argue that this bill will lead to more informed and appropriate management of water resources, promoting sustainability and supporting local communities. However, it could also encounter opposition from entities concerned about uniformity in regulations, fearing that localized rules might lead to complications in enforcement or create disparities in water availability among regions.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from the implementation of differentiated rules for groundwater management. Some stakeholders may express concerns regarding the potential for inconsistent regulation across the state or the capacity of conservation districts to effectively manage such variability. There is also a possibility that varying rules could result in conflicts or confusion among water users who operate across multiple conservation districts. Overall, the bill highlights the ongoing debate between localized governance versus standardized state-wide policies in water resource management.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB193

Monterey County Water Resources Agency: Lake Nacimiento and Lake San Antonio: white bass.

CA AB1757

California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006: climate goal: natural and working lands.

TX HB836

Relating to the development of brackish groundwater.

CA AB1044

Tule East Groundwater Sustainability Agency Act.

AZ SB1041

Groundwater savings certificate; assured water

CA SB963

Water replenishment districts.

CA SB372

San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors Groundwater Sustainability Agency.

TX SB1392

Relating to groundwater conservation districts.