Texas House Bill HB1839

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 2/25/11
• Out of House Committee: 5/2/11
• Voted on by House: 5/6/11
• Refer: 3/3/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/20/11
• Report Pass: 4/29/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/23/11
• Engrossed: 5/6/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 5/9/11
• Report Pass: 5/20/11
• Enrolled: 5/24/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to excluding a provider of recreational classes that do not lead to an educational credential from regulation as a career school or college.

Impact

The passage of HB1839 could significantly impact the landscape of recreational education in Texas by distinguishing between educational institutions that provide formal credentials and those that focus on recreational or hobby-based instruction. By excusing these recreational providers from regulatory oversight, the bill seeks to promote the growth of informal educational sectors, fostering more opportunities for individuals to engage in recreational learning. This change could potentially expand access to a broader range of classes for the public.

Summary

House Bill 1839 aims to amend the Texas Education Code by excluding certain providers of recreational classes from being classified as career schools or colleges. This exemption specifically targets schools or training programs that offer avocational or recreational instruction in areas such as dance, music, martial arts, yoga, and various physical fitness activities. The intent behind this legislation is to ease the regulatory burdens on such providers, allowing them to operate more freely without the stringent expectations placed on accredited educational institutions.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB1839 include concerns over the potential lack of oversight for recreational classes. Critics argue that this exemption may lead to variability in instructional quality and safety standards since these classes would no longer be subject to the same regulatory framework as accredited career schools and colleges. Proponents of the bill, however, maintain that the existing regulations can be overly burdensome for these types of educational providers and limit public participation in recreational and avocational programs.