Texas House Bill HB1869

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of House Committee: 3/30/11
• Introduced: 2/25/11
• Voted on by House: 4/8/11
• Refer: 3/7/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/6/11
• Report Pass: 3/29/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/17/11
• Engrossed: 4/8/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Enrolled: 5/18/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to local governments that may consider a bidder's principal place of business when awarding a contract.

Impact

If enacted, HB 1869 would specifically affect how municipalities and counties approach public contracts, marking a shift towards prioritizing local businesses based on their principal place of business. This could lead to increased opportunities for local vendors and suppliers, as they may have an advantage in winning governmental contracts over non-local competitors. As a result, this could alter the competitive landscape for public procurement in Texas, encouraging more engagement from small and medium-sized enterprises based in local areas.

Summary

House Bill 1869 seeks to modify the regulations concerning local governments and their contracting processes, particularly in relation to the principal place of business of bidders. This bill amends existing sections of the Local Government Code to allow municipalities and counties to consider where a business is based when awarding contracts. The intent behind this legislation is to potentially favor local businesses in procurement processes, thus supporting local economies and ensuring that taxpayer money is utilized to benefit the local community.

Contention

However, the bill has generated some discussions regarding possible implications for competition and cost-effectiveness in public procurement. Critics may argue that restricting contract awards solely based on a bidder's location might lead to higher costs or a reduced selection of bidders, which could ultimately affect the quality of services or goods provided. Advocates for the bill counter that supporting local businesses is essential for community growth and economic sustainability, indicating a potential divide between local economic interests and broader procurement efficiency.