Texas House Bill HB2002

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/1/11
• Out of House Committee: 4/8/11
• Voted on by House: 4/27/11
• Refer: 3/7/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/10/11
• Report Pass: 4/5/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/13/11
• Engrossed: 4/27/11
• Governor Action: 5/28/11
• Refer: 5/4/11
• Report Pass: 5/10/11
• Enrolled: 5/16/11
• Passed: 5/28/11

Caption

Relating to the county ethics commission for certain counties.

Impact

By revising the terms of service for ethics commission members and establishing a required training program, the bill seeks to ensure that all members are adequately prepared to handle their duties. These changes are expected to improve efficiencies within the complaints process and enhance the overall integrity of local governance. The bill aligns county codes with the necessity for ethical standards and accountability mechanisms which govern public officials.

Summary

House Bill 2002 aims to enhance the operation and functionality of county ethics commissions in Texas, particularly with respect to their structure, member terms, and procedural requirements. The bill amendment modifies several sections of the Local Government Code to establish clearer guidelines around the appointment of members, training requirements, and procedures for handling complaints against public officials. Notable enhancements include a more streamlined process for the commissions to resolve complaints and clear definitions of member responsibilities.

Contention

While proponents of HB 2002 argue that it strengthens ethical governance and fosters greater public confidence in local institutions through clearer guidelines and protections for whistleblowers, some critics believe that the bill may not sufficiently address deep-rooted issues of corruption and misconduct. Concerns were raised regarding the adequacy of the complaint resolution process and the adequacy of the training provided to commission members. There is a view that more robust measures are necessary to effectively deter unethical behavior within local government.