Texas House Bill HB211

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Caption

Relating to this state's goal for renewable energy.

Impact

The potential impact of HB 211 on Texas state law includes a formal commitment to increase the state’s reliance on renewable energy, contributing to broader environmental and sustainability goals. By clearly defining renewable energy capacity targets, the bill aims to promote the growth of the renewable sector, enhance energy independence, and potentially reduce reliance on fossil fuels. Furthermore, this legislative framework seeks to encourage investments in renewable technologies, particularly in solar energy, thus influencing the state's energy market dynamics significantly.

Summary

House Bill 211 aims to establish renewable energy goals for the state of Texas, specifically targeting the generation capacity from renewable energy technologies. The bill mandates that by January 1, 2020, at least 35 percent of Texas's generating capacity should come from renewable sources, with a specific requirement for 2 percent to derive from solar technologies. The bill provides a framework within which the Texas Commission can implement measures to facilitate these goals, including the possibility of setting alternative compliance payments for entities that cannot meet their renewable energy purchase requirements directly.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 211 appears to favor the shift towards renewable energy, reflecting the growing recognition of climate change and the need for sustainable energy solutions. Supporters view the bill as a positive step towards cleaner energy production, advocating for Texas’s long-term environmental health and economic viability. However, the sentiment may be mixed among various stakeholders, particularly those concerned about potential economic implications for traditional energy sectors and the pace of transition.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill may arise from differing opinions on the feasibility and effectiveness of setting such ambitious renewable energy targets. Critics may raise concerns about the economic burden on energy providers, the readiness of infrastructure to support such a transition, and the implications for jobs within traditional energy sectors. Moreover, discussions may center around the practicalities of enforcing compliance and achieving these goals, particularly in a state with a history of advocating for minimal regulatory intervention in energy markets.