Relating to a notification requirement if a public school campus or open-enrollment charter school does not have a nurse assigned to the campus during all instructional hours.
If enacted, HB 2117 would significantly change the landscape of educational funding in the state. Current laws often allow for substantial disparities in funding based on local property values, leading to inequities in educational quality and resources. By implementing a more standardized, per-student funding approach, the bill is expected to increase funding for under-resourced schools, thereby boosting educational offerings and outcomes. Lawmakers anticipate that this restructuring could lead to improved academic performance statewide.
House Bill 2117 is legislation aimed at reforming the funding structure for public education in the state. The bill seeks to address inequalities by ensuring more equitable distribution of resources among schools, particularly those in lower-income areas. It proposes a shift towards a per-student funding model, which would allocate financial resources based on enrollment numbers rather than property taxes, which often favor wealthier districts. This change aims to level the playing field and enhance educational opportunities for all students across the state.
The sentiment regarding HB 2117 has been largely positive, particularly among educational advocacy groups and parents who support increased funding for public schools. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step towards achieving justice and equity within the education system. However, there are concerns among certain lawmakers regarding the feasibility of the proposed funding model, with some fearing that it may lead to budget shortfalls and further complicate financial aspects of school districts. Overall, the discussion remains centered around the importance of fair funding rather than preserving existing disparities.
Despite its support, there are notable points of contention surrounding HB 2117. Some legislators express concerns over the long-term sustainability of the proposed funding model and its potential impacts on local control of school budgets. Opponents worry that shifting to a per-student funding approach may undermine the ability of districts to manage their finances effectively, especially in high-cost areas. Additionally, the bill has sparked debates about the balance between state oversight and local governance in education policies. As discussions continue, stakeholders are weighing the benefits of equity against the complexities of implementation.