Texas House Bill HB2190

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/15/11
• Introduced: 3/4/11
• Voted on by House: 5/12/11
• Refer: 3/8/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/20/11
• Report Pass: 4/7/11
• Engrossed: 5/12/11
• Refer: 5/12/11
• Report Pass: 5/20/11

Caption

Relating to the deadlines by which provisional ballots must be processed and the state canvass must be conducted for certain elections.

Impact

By updating Sections of the Election Code, HB 2190 modifies the responsibilities of the early voting ballot board and voter registrars in processing provisional ballots. It also allows the canvassing authority to convene for local canvasses not later than the 14th day after an election day where provisional ballots are applied. The changes made by the bill are intended to streamline the voting process and reduce delays that could affect election outcomes. Local canvassing authorities and the Governor’s office will have specified times to conduct state canvasses, designed to further regulate and clarify the election timeline.

Summary

House Bill 2190 addresses the timelines involved in processing provisional ballots and conducting state canvasses for elections in Texas. The bill introduces specific deadlines, such as requiring that provisional ballots be verified and counted by the early voting ballot board no later than the 13th day after the election. This amendment aims to expedite the resolution of provisional ballots, which are critical for ensuring that eligible voters can have their voices heard while also maintaining election integrity.

Contention

Discussion surrounding HB 2190 may include concerns regarding the balance between expediency and the thoroughness of election security. While supporters argue that the quicker processing of provisional ballots can enhance voter participation and ensure timely election results, others may worry that hasty procedures could compromise the accuracy of counting. Additionally, there may be debate on how these changes could affect local jurisdictions, with concerns that standardized deadlines could overlook specific local needs or circumstances surrounding the elections.