Texas House Bill HB2285

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of House Committee: 5/3/11
• Introduced: 3/4/11
• Voted on by House: 5/6/11
• Refer: 3/10/11
• Report Pass: 4/20/11
• Engrossed: 5/6/11
• Refer: 5/9/11

Caption

Relating to reimbursement of costs incurred for the collection of certain blood specimens as a condition of community supervision.

Impact

The introduction of HB 2285 is expected to have considerable implications for state laws governing community supervision. By clarifying the financial obligations related to blood specimen collection, the bill ensures that local law enforcement agencies are compensated for their efforts. This may lead to improved collaboration between the judicial system and law enforcement, as it delineates clear responsibilities and creates a funding mechanism for costs that may otherwise be a financial burden on local entities. Such measures could enhance accountability in the community supervision process, ensuring that necessary procedures are adequately funded.

Summary

House Bill 2285 relates to the reimbursement of costs incurred by law enforcement agencies for the collection of certain blood specimens, specifically as a condition of community supervision. The bill amends Section 11(a) of Article 42.12 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to allow for such reimbursement, thereby establishing a structured process to compensate for the expenses incurred during such procedures. The legislation primarily aims to address the financial responsibilities related to the collection and management of blood specimens from defendants on community supervision, emphasizing the costs associated with law enforcement efforts in this area.

Contention

While the bill has the potential to improve oversight and funding for blood specimen collection, there could be points of contention regarding its implementation. Concerns may arise surrounding the extent of reimbursement and whether the costs will create additional financial strains on judicial systems or local governments. Moreover, discussions may focus on how the bill impacts the rights of defendants placed on community supervision, particularly regarding the associated costs and how it can affect their rehabilitation and reintegration into the community. The balance between fiscal responsibility and the rights of individuals under supervision will likely be a significant topic during deliberations.