Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB233

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to requirements for students to be assessed in certain subjects and in certain grades.

Impact

The passage of HB233 would significantly impact state education laws by establishing stricter criteria for assessing students before they advance to subsequent grades. For instance, students who do not meet the adjusted passing standards in critical subjects such as mathematics and reading would be required to undergo additional assessments. This mechanism is likely to tighten academic performance expectations and ensure that students achieve fundamental competencies before promotion, which proponents suggest could enhance overall educational outcomes.

Summary

House Bill 233 aims to revise the requirements for student assessments in certain subjects and grades in Texas. This legislation modifies the existing regulations in the Education Code to include mandatory assessments in reading, writing, mathematics, social studies, and science for students in specific grades. The bill emphasizes the assessment framework which mandates that students demonstrate a requisite knowledge level by being tested several times throughout their educational progression.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment towards HB233 appears to reflect a mix of support and concern. Supporters argue that the bill is a necessary step to uphold academic standards and accountability within the Texas education system. They believe that these assessments will ensure that students receive the foundational knowledge required to succeed in higher grades. However, critics of the bill worry about the approach of necessitating assessments at multiple stages, fearing it may lead to increased pressure on students and educators alike, potentially detracting from holistic educational experiences.

Contention

Notable contention surrounding HB233 lies in the balance between maintaining educational standards and the pressure of standardized testing. Opponents argue that the bill could contribute to a 'teaching to the test' environment that prioritizes rote memorization over comprehensive learning. Furthermore, there is concern about the implications for students who struggle academically, as the fear exists that increased assessments could widen achievement gaps rather than bridge them. As each student navigates these requirements, the effects on their educational journey and mental well-being remain critical considerations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.