Texas House Bill HB2354

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/11/11
• Introduced: 3/7/11
• Voted on by House: 4/25/11
• Refer: 3/10/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/12/11
• Report Pass: 4/6/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/19/11
• Engrossed: 4/25/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Report Pass: 5/12/11
• Enrolled: 5/21/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to the installation and use of a pen register, ESN reader, trap and trace device, mobile tracking device, or similar equipment in a correctional facility operated by or under contract with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.

Impact

If enacted, HB2354 will amend existing provisions in the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, providing law enforcement with clearly defined powers and responsibilities regarding the surveillance technology. This could result in an increase in the use of surveillance technologies in correctional settings, with implications for how inmate communication is monitored and recorded. The bill is designed to safeguard the integrity of criminal investigations while ensuring the process remains transparent and regulated.

Summary

House Bill 2354 relates to the use and installation of pen registers, ESN readers, trap and trace devices, and similar equipment within correctional facilities that are operated by or contracted through the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The bill aims to clarify the legal framework under which these surveillance equipment can be utilized, primarily by law enforcement officials. It specifies the types of law enforcement officers permitted to apply for, use, and install such devices while also detailing the processes necessary for authorization and oversight.

Contention

Some possible points of contention include concerns about individual privacy rights and the potential for misuse of surveillance powers granted to law enforcement. Critics may argue that expanded surveillance capabilities could lead to overreach or unethical monitoring practices, particularly in environments that should prioritize rehabilitation rather than increased scrutiny. Supporters, however, may contend that such measures are essential for maintaining security and effective management in correctional facilities.