Texas House Bill HB2389

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/26/11
• Introduced: 3/7/11
• Voted on by House: 5/11/11
• Refer: 3/10/11
• Engrossed: 5/11/11
• Refer: 5/11/11

Caption

Relating to records of a holder of a motor vehicle title service license.

Impact

The impact of HB2389 is significant as it revises existing regulations governing motor vehicle title services, aiming to protect consumers through stricter record-keeping and identification requirements. By ensuring that the title service license holders verify and document customer identification and vehicle details thoroughly, the bill seeks to prevent fraudulent activities associated with vehicle titles. This enhancement of record-keeping protocols is likely to fortify the integrity of vehicle ownership documentation, thus fostering greater accountability within the industry.

Summary

House Bill 2389 aims to amend Section 520.057 of the Transportation Code related to the requirements for holders of a motor vehicle title service license. The bill introduces specific provisions about the records that these license holders must maintain for each transaction for which they receive compensation. This includes essential information about the customer involved in the transaction, including personal identification details and vehicle information. Specifically, it mandates that the records include the date of the transaction, comprehensive identification of the customer, and details about the vehicle in question, thereby enhancing the regulatory framework surrounding motor vehicle title services.

Contention

There may be points of contention regarding the implementation of these regulations, particularly concerning the additional administrative burden it places on title service businesses. Opponents might argue that the requirements for maintaining comprehensive records could lead to increased operational costs, particularly for smaller businesses that may struggle to adapt to new compliance standards. Conversely, supporters of the bill may argue that these measures are necessary to stabilize the industry and protect consumers from potential fraud, advocating that long-term benefits will outweigh the short-term challenges faced by service providers.