Texas House Bill HB2496

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/8/11
• Out of House Committee: 4/28/11
• Voted on by House: 5/15/11
• Refer: 3/14/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/21/11
• Report Pass: 4/20/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/25/11
• Engrossed: 5/15/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 5/16/11
• Report Pass: 5/21/11
• Enrolled: 5/27/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to creating a teen dating violence court program and the deferral of adjudication and dismissal of certain dating violence cases.

Impact

If enacted, HB 2496 would amend the Family Code to introduce provisions for deferring adjudication for first-time juvenile offenders charged with dating violence. This deferral process is designed for those children who have not previously been in contact with the juvenile court system regarding similar offenses. By allowing these youth to complete a rehabilitative program rather than facing immediate adjudication, the bill aims to reduce repeat offenses and assist in the reintegration of young individuals into society with better awareness and understanding of healthy relationship dynamics.

Summary

House Bill 2496 proposes the establishment of a Teen Dating Violence Court Program aimed at addressing incidents of dating violence among minors in Texas. The bill seeks to create a specialized framework within the juvenile justice system that provides educational resources and support for young offenders who have engaged in dating violence. This 12-week program will encompass educational components designed to deter future incidents, alongside services for teen victims to ensure they receive appropriate advocacy and support throughout the legal process.

Contention

While the bill is anticipated to have a positive impact on young offenders and victims alike, notable points of contention may arise around the implementation and funding of these programs. Critics might raise concerns regarding the effectiveness of such educational programs to change behavior comprehensively. There may also be broader discussions on the allocation of resources for these initiatives within the juvenile justice system, especially in counties that might face budget constraints. Additionally, advocates for stricter penalties might argue that offering educational programs dilutes accountability for violent behavior in young individuals.