Texas House Bill HB2541

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/7/11
• Introduced: 3/8/11
• Voted on by House: 4/19/11
• Refer: 3/15/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/20/11
• Report Pass: 4/4/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/25/11
• Engrossed: 4/19/11
• Governor Action: 6/17/11
• Refer: 4/26/11
• Enrolled: 5/27/11
• Passed: 6/17/11

Caption

Relating to the regulation of traffic on certain roads by counties.

Impact

Should the bill pass, it would empower local communities to have a more significant say in traffic enforcement on their roads, promoting a safer driving environment. This shift could lead to the establishment of official traffic control measures, such as signs and signals, on previously unregulated roads that people frequently use. Additionally, it underscores an important collaboration between local residents and county authorities in managing traffic concerns.

Summary

House Bill 2541 introduces a framework for counties in Texas to extend traffic enforcement on certain roads maintained by special districts located in unincorporated areas. Specifically targeted at counties with a population of less than one million, this bill allows residents within a special district to petition their county's commissioners court for the enforcement of specific traffic rules over the roads in their district. The proposal is intended to enhance road safety and ensure uniformity in traffic regulations across these areas.

Contention

The bill may not be without its challenges. There could be debates surrounding the financial implications of extending enforcement, as the commissioners court is allowed to require special districts to fund part or all of the enforcement costs. This aspect of the bill could face pushback due to concerns about the financial burdens placed on the communities or special districts seeking enhanced traffic regulation. Additionally, some stakeholders may question the balance of local control versus county authority regarding traffic management.

Notable_points

HB2541 would mandate that petitions from residents need support from at least 50 percent of property owners in the affected area, which not only emphasizes community involvement but also ensures that changes reflect the desires of a significant portion of residents. The requirement for consultation with law enforcement to assess enforcement costs exemplifies a structured approach to the implementation of this legislation, aiming for practicality and community safety.