Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB2554

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to possession of or access to a child in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would significantly impact the evaluation of custodial rights and parental responsibilities in family law cases. It proposes a presumption of co-parenting unless proven otherwise, altering how courts determine custody and access to children. The amendments would ensure that parents are assumed to be fit unless sufficient evidence is presented to establish otherwise. This approach aims to foster equal involvement in parenting, thereby facilitating a collaborative environment between parents post-separation.

Summary

House Bill 2554 addresses issues related to the possession of or access to a child in cases affecting the parent-child relationship in Texas. The primary focus of the bill is to ensure that fit parents are not rendered as second-class parents without just cause and that there is a presumption of fit parenting as long as the parent provides adequate care. The bill seeks to amend sections of the Family Code to reinforce that parental rights should only be altered based on mutual agreement or a court finding of unfitness by clear and convincing evidence.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2554 appears to be supportive among advocacy groups focused on parental rights. Proponents argue that the bill protects the fundamental rights of parents and instills a sense of fairness in custody disputes, while also emphasizing the welfare of children. However, there may be concerns regarding the implementation of the unfitness standard, especially from those who feel that it could be used to undermine carefully crafted custody arrangements in complex family situations.

Contention

Notable points of contention involve the definitions of parental fitness and the implications for grandparental rights. The bill places a heavy burden of proof on those seeking to limit a parent's rights, which some opponents believe may complicate situations where children could benefit from additional protective measures. There is also concern about how the proposed equitable parenting arrangements will play out in practical terms for families, particularly in the face of disagreements or conflicts over access and custody.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB3182

Housing:governing documents: rental or leasing of separate interests: accessory dwelling units.

CA SB444

Property insurance: insurable interest.

CA AB319

Mobilehome Parks Act: inspectors: conflict of interest: enforcement actions: sunset.

CA AB534

Common interest developments: mechanics liens.

TX HB2261

Relating to the transfer or termination of certain timeshare interests.

TX SB738

Relating to the transfer or termination of certain timeshare interests.

CA SB401

Political Reform Act of 1974: state employees: financial interests.

CA SB407

Common interest developments: noncommercial solicitation.