Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB2645

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the exclusion of subcontracting payments made by a staff leasing services company in determining total revenue for purposes of the franchise tax.

Impact

The impact of HB 2645 is primarily financial, as it could result in lower tax burdens for staff leasing services companies. By excluding subcontracting payments from revenue calculations, these businesses may find it easier to remain compliant with tax regulations while also using their resources more effectively for operational growth. Additionally, the bill aims to streamline tax reporting processes for companies in the staff leasing sector, which could lead to increased transparency in their revenue reporting practices.

Summary

House Bill 2645 addresses the determination of total revenue for franchise tax purposes specifically for staff leasing services companies. The bill proposes to amend the Tax Code by allowing these companies to exclude subcontracting payments made to nonemployee agents from their total revenue calculations. This change is intended to offer a clearer financial picture of these businesses, enabling them to potentially reduce their franchise tax liabilities significantly.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 2645 leans towards positive support from industry stakeholders who believe the bill will alleviate undue tax burdens. Many advocates argue that this bill is crucial for facilitating growth within the staff leasing industry by optimizing tax structures. However, there may also be concerns from fiscal conservatives regarding potential revenue losses for the state that could arise from these exclusions.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding the bill include concerns about the broader implications of excluding subcontracting payments. Critics may argue that such exclusions could foster a lack of accountability in reporting revenue, as companies could choose to engage in less transparent subcontracting arrangements. Furthermore, questions about the overall impact on state revenue and the fairness of such a tax structure in relation to other industries are essential aspects of the argument surrounding this legislation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.