Texas House Bill HB2680

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/9/11
• Out of House Committee: 4/7/11
• Voted on by House: 4/20/11
• Refer: 3/16/11
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/3/11
• Report Pass: 4/5/11
• Voted on by Senate: 5/10/11
• Engrossed: 4/20/11
• Governor Action: 5/21/11
• Refer: 4/27/11
• Report Pass: 5/3/11
• Enrolled: 5/11/11
• Passed: 5/21/11

Caption

Relating to the procedure for certain small local exchange companies to propose to offer certain services or to make a minor change in a rate or tariff.

Impact

If enacted, HB2680 would amend the Utilities Code, primarily Sections 53.301 and 53.304, to change the definition of 'minor changes' and revise the procedural requirements needed for service or rate proposals in smaller local exchange companies. It allows these companies to implement changes without going through extensive regulatory hurdles, thus potentially increasing competition within the telecommunication market and improving service availability in less populated areas. This could lead to enhanced connectivity for residents in areas previously underserved by larger telecommunication providers.

Summary

House Bill 2680 aims to modify the procedures by which certain small local exchange companies can propose new services or make minor changes to their rates or tariffs. Specifically targeted at cooperative corporations or those with fewer than 31,000 access lines, the bill seeks to streamline the regulatory process that these smaller entities must navigate. By providing a clearer path for proposals, supporters argue that it will encourage service expansions, particularly in rural areas where such companies operate. The bill facilitates the process by allowing a more lenient framework for reporting changes to the Texas Commission, which could lead to quicker implementation of services that benefit consumers.

Contention

While proponents of HB2680 argue that easing regulatory burdens will enhance service offerings and connectivity, critics may express concerns regarding oversight and consumer protection. There could be apprehensions that reducing the procedural requirements might lead to insufficient consumer notification or engagement. Additionally, there is potential contention about the implications for rate changes, as the new definitions and thresholds may allow for more frequent adjustments that could affect service affordability and accessibility.