Texas House Bill HB2726

Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

• Introduced: 3/9/11
• Refer: 3/16/11

Caption

Relating to liability of an employee of an independent contractor of a transportation entity.

Impact

The implications of HB2726 are significant for how independent contractors operating under transportation entities are legally viewed in the state. By establishing that liability is restricted to that of the transportation authority, the bill potentially reduces the legal exposure of employees working for independent contractors. This provision is designed to encourage more contractors to engage with transportation entities without the fear of extensive liability that could arise from their actions while performing their duties.

Summary

House Bill 2726 addresses the liability of employees of independent contractors associated with transportation entities in Texas. The bill specifies that these employees are liable for damages only to the extent that the authority they serve would be liable, effectively modifying existing interpretations of liability associated with transportation services. This change aims to clarify the legal responsibilities of independent contractors and their employees when engaging in functions related to transportation authorities.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB2726 appears to be supportive among those involved in transportation services, particularly independent contractors who may have been deterred from the industry due to fear of liability issues. However, there may be concerns expressed by those advocating for accountability and transparency within transportation services, fearing that limitations on liability could result in a lack of sufficient legal recourse for damages caused by negligence.

Contention

Notably, discussions surrounding the passage of HB2726 highlight a tension between the facilitation of business operations and the need for accountability in public service functions. Supporters argue that the bill fosters a more open environment for independent contractors, enhancing service offerings without the burden of overwhelming liability. Critics, on the other hand, might contend that such legislation could inadvertently undermine public safety and service quality by limiting the liability of those who operate public transportation services.