Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB2754

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the electronic submission of testimony regarding a bill or resolution before a committee or subcommittee of the legislature.

Impact

The introduction of HB2754 is expected to have a significant impact on Texas state law related to legislative committee processes. Specifically, it amends Chapter 323 of the Government Code to mandate that legislative councils create accessible online platforms for public testimony. The provisions laid out within the bill ensure that submitted electronic testimony is treated equivalently to in-person testimony, thereby preserving the integrity and importance of public input in legislative discussions. The changes aim to streamline legislative operations and make them more responsive to public sentiment.

Summary

House Bill 2754 aims to modernize the way constituents can provide feedback on legislation by allowing electronic submission of testimony regarding bills or resolutions under consideration by legislative committees. By implementing an online platform, the bill facilitates easier access for individuals who wish to express their opinions on pending measures, ensuring that the voices of citizens are captured more efficiently during the legislative process. This initiative is anticipated to enhance civic engagement and encourage greater public participation in governmental affairs.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB2754 appears to be positive, especially among advocates of transparency and citizen engagement. Supporters argue that the bill is a necessary step towards making the legislative process more accessible and inclusive. By enabling electronic testimony, the bill is seen as a tool to empower citizens, giving them a direct avenue to influence decision-makers. However, there may also be concerns about the potential for overwhelming committees with electronic submissions, which advocates hope to manage through robust procedural guidelines.

Contention

One potential point of contention regarding HB2754 is the reliance on technology and the implications for individuals with limited access to the internet or digital literacy skills. While the bill seeks to promote inclusivity, some critics may argue that it does not fully address these disparities. Furthermore, the proper implementation of electronic submissions requires careful consideration of security protocols and verification processes, ensuring that submissions are legitimate and representative of true public opinion. Balancing the ease of electronic testimony with the need for maintaining a thorough and fair legislative process will be essential as this bill moves forward.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB679

Criminal trials: testimony of in-custody informants.

HI HB1222

Relating To Legislative Access Through Remote Testimony.

HI SB613

Relating To Legislative Access Through Remote Testimony.

HI HB1542

Relating To Legislative Access Through Remote Testimony.

HI SB613

Relating To Legislative Access Through Remote Testimony.

HI SB2436

Relating To Legislative Access Through Remote Testimony.

HI HB1222

Relating To Legislative Access Through Remote Testimony.

CA AB359

In-custody informants.