Texas 2011 - 82nd Regular

Texas House Bill HB2801 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                            82R10612 JTS-D
 By: Pickett H.B. No. 2801


 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to comprehensive development agreements of the Texas
 Department of Transportation that include the financing, design,
 and construction of a project.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1.  Section 223.201(b), Transportation Code, is
 amended to read as follows:
 (b)  In this subchapter, "comprehensive development
 agreement" means an agreement that, at a minimum, provides for the
 financing, design, and construction[, rehabilitation, expansion,
 or improvement] of a project described in Subsection (a) and may
 also provide for the [financing,] acquisition, maintenance, or
 operation of a project described in Subsection (a).  For purposes of
 this subsection, construction of a project includes
 rehabilitation, expansion, or improvement of a project.
 SECTION 2.  Section 223.203, Transportation Code, is amended
 by amending Subsections (a), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (l), and (o)
 and adding Subsections (f-2) and (l-1) to read as follows:
 (a)  If the department enters into a comprehensive
 development agreement, the department shall use a competitive
 procurement process that provides the best value for the
 department.  [The department may accept unsolicited proposals for a
 proposed project or solicit proposals in accordance with this
 section.]
 (c)  If the department decides to issue a request for
 qualifications for a proposed project, the [The] department shall
 publish a notice advertising a request for competing proposals and
 qualifications in the Texas Register that includes the criteria to
 be used to evaluate the proposals, the relative weight given to the
 criteria, and a deadline by which proposals must be received [if:
 [(1)     the department decides to issue a request for
 qualifications for a proposed project; or
 [(2)     the department authorizes the further evaluation
 of an unsolicited proposal].
 (d)  A proposal submitted in response to a request published
 under Subsection (c) must contain, at a minimum, information
 regarding the private entity's qualifications, experience,
 technical competence, and capability to develop the project [the
 information required by Subsections (b)(2) and (3)].
 (e)  The department may interview a private entity
 [submitting an unsolicited proposal or] responding to a request
 under Subsection (c).  The department shall evaluate each proposal
 based on the criteria described in the request for competing
 proposals and qualifications and may qualify or shortlist private
 entities to submit detailed proposals under Subsection (f).  The
 department must qualify or shortlist at least two private entities
 to submit detailed proposals for a project under Subsection (f)
 unless the department does not receive more than one proposal or one
 response to a request under Subsection (c).
 (f)  After obtaining environmental clearance for a project,
 the [The] department shall issue a request for detailed proposals
 from all private entities qualified or shortlisted under Subsection
 (e) [or prequalified under Subsection (e-1) if the department
 proceeds with the further evaluation of a proposed project].  A
 request under this subsection may require additional information
 relating to:
 (1)  the private entity's qualifications and
 demonstrated technical competence;
 (2)  the feasibility of developing the project as
 proposed;
 (3)  engineering or architectural designs;
 (4)  the private entity's ability to meet schedules;
 (5)  a financial plan, including costing methodology
 and cost proposals; or
 (6)  any other information the department considers
 relevant or necessary.
 (f-2)  A private entity responding to a request for detailed
 proposals issued under Subsection (f) must identify:
 (1)  companies that will fill key project roles,
 including project management, lead design firm, quality control
 management, and quality assurance management; and
 (2)  entities that will serve as key task leaders for
 geotechnical, hydraulics and hydrology, structural, environmental,
 utility, and right-of-way issues.
 (g)  In issuing a request for detailed proposals under
 Subsection (f), the department may solicit input from entities
 qualified under Subsection (e) or any other person.  The department
 may also solicit input regarding alternative technical concepts
 after issuing a request under Subsection (f).  A technical solution
 presented with a proposal for a project must be complete and
 demonstrate full compliance with, and have demonstrated resources
 to be able to fulfill, all technical requirements for the project,
 including specified quality assurance and quality control program
 requirements, safety program requirements, and environmental
 program requirements. A proposal that includes a technical
 solution that does not meet those requirements is ineligible for
 further consideration.
 (l)  A private entity selected for a comprehensive
 development agreement may not make changes to the companies or
 entities identified under Subsection (f-2) unless the original
 company or entity:
 (1)  is no longer in business, is unable to fulfill its
 legal, financial, or business obligations, or can no longer meet
 the terms of the teaming agreement with the private entity;
 (2)  voluntarily removes itself from the team;
 (3)  fails to provide a sufficient number of qualified
 personnel to fulfill the duties identified during the proposal
 stage; or
 (4)  fails to negotiate in good faith in a timely manner
 in accordance with provisions established in the teaming agreement
 proposed for the project.
 (l-1)  If the private entity makes team changes in violation
 of Subsection (l), any cost savings resulting from the change
 accrue to the state and not to the private entity. [The department
 may require that an unsolicited proposal be accompanied by a
 nonrefundable fee sufficient to cover all or part of its cost to
 review the proposal.]
 (o)  All teaming agreements and subconsultant agreements
 must be executed and provided to the department before the
 execution of the comprehensive development agreement. [Subchapter
 A of this chapter and Chapter 2254, Government Code, do not apply to
 a comprehensive development agreement entered into under this
 subchapter.]
 SECTION 3.  Section 223.204(a), Transportation Code, is
 amended to read as follows:
 (a)  To encourage private entities to submit proposals under
 this subchapter, the following information is confidential, is not
 subject to disclosure, inspection, or copying under Chapter 552,
 Government Code, and is not subject to disclosure, discovery,
 subpoena, or other means of legal compulsion for its release until a
 final contract for a proposed project is entered into:
 (1)  all or part of a proposal that is submitted by a
 private entity for a comprehensive development agreement, except
 information described by Section 223.203(d) [provided under
 Sections 223.203(b)(1) and (2)], unless the private entity consents
 to the disclosure of the information;
 (2)  supplemental information or material submitted by
 a private entity in connection with a proposal for a comprehensive
 development agreement, unless the private entity consents to the
 disclosure of the information or material; and
 (3)  information created or collected by the department
 or its agent during consideration of a proposal for a comprehensive
 development agreement.
 SECTION 4.  Sections 223.201(f), (h), and (i) and
 223.203(b), (e-1), and (e-2), Transportation Code, are repealed.
 SECTION 5.  The changes in law made by this Act to Section
 223.203, Transportation Code, apply only to a comprehensive
 development agreement entered into on or after the effective date
 of this Act.
 SECTION 6.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2011.