1 | 1 | | By: King of Taylor, Naishtat H.B. No. 2819 |
---|
2 | 2 | | (Senate Sponsor - Nelson) |
---|
3 | 3 | | (In the Senate - Received from the House May 16, 2011; |
---|
4 | 4 | | May 16, 2011, read first time and referred to Committee on Health |
---|
5 | 5 | | and Human Services; May 20, 2011, reported favorably by the |
---|
6 | 6 | | following vote: Yeas 7, Nays 0; May 20, 2011, sent to printer.) |
---|
7 | 7 | | |
---|
8 | 8 | | |
---|
9 | 9 | | A BILL TO BE ENTITLED |
---|
10 | 10 | | AN ACT |
---|
11 | 11 | | relating to the operation and efficiency of the eligibility |
---|
12 | 12 | | determination process for supplemental nutrition assistance |
---|
13 | 13 | | program benefits. |
---|
14 | 14 | | BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: |
---|
15 | 15 | | SECTION 1. Chapter 33, Human Resources Code, is amended by |
---|
16 | 16 | | designating Sections 33.0005 through 33.028 as Subchapter A and |
---|
17 | 17 | | adding a subchapter heading to read as follows: |
---|
18 | 18 | | SUBCHAPTER A. NUTRITIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS IN GENERAL |
---|
19 | 19 | | SECTION 2. Chapter 33, Human Resources Code, is amended by |
---|
20 | 20 | | adding Subchapter B to read as follows: |
---|
21 | 21 | | SUBCHAPTER B. SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: |
---|
22 | 22 | | ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION PROCESS EFFICIENCY |
---|
23 | 23 | | Sec. 33.051. DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter: |
---|
24 | 24 | | (1) "Commission" means the Health and Human Services |
---|
25 | 25 | | Commission. |
---|
26 | 26 | | (2) "Supplemental nutrition assistance program" means |
---|
27 | 27 | | the nutritional assistance program formerly referred to as the food |
---|
28 | 28 | | stamp program. |
---|
29 | 29 | | Sec. 33.052. APPLICATION ASSISTANCE. (a) The commission |
---|
30 | 30 | | shall develop procedures to ensure that: |
---|
31 | 31 | | (1) clear guidance on program eligibility |
---|
32 | 32 | | requirements is provided to supplemental nutrition assistance |
---|
33 | 33 | | applicants and prospective applicants and mechanisms are |
---|
34 | 34 | | established, including Internet and e-mail mechanisms, as |
---|
35 | 35 | | appropriate, by which applicants can obtain answers to basic |
---|
36 | 36 | | program-related questions; and |
---|
37 | 37 | | (2) information is provided to each applicant in |
---|
38 | 38 | | person, by e-mail, by telephone, or through the mail, as |
---|
39 | 39 | | appropriate, about information the applicant is required to submit |
---|
40 | 40 | | for purposes of the eligibility determination process. |
---|
41 | 41 | | (b) The commission shall consider the feasibility and |
---|
42 | 42 | | cost-effectiveness of using office personnel or an automated system |
---|
43 | 43 | | or systems to support the eligibility determination process by |
---|
44 | 44 | | contacting an applicant in advance of an applicant's scheduled |
---|
45 | 45 | | interview to remind the applicant of the interview and the |
---|
46 | 46 | | documentation that must be presented at the interview. |
---|
47 | 47 | | Sec. 33.053. USE OF TECHNOLOGY TO PROMOTE EFFICIENCY AND |
---|
48 | 48 | | FRAUD DETECTION. (a) The commission shall consider the |
---|
49 | 49 | | feasibility and cost-effectiveness of using readily available |
---|
50 | 50 | | document scanning technology to reduce storage and maintenance |
---|
51 | 51 | | costs and potential loss of data by creating electronic case files |
---|
52 | 52 | | for supplemental nutrition assistance cases instead of maintaining |
---|
53 | 53 | | physical files for those cases. The commission shall use that |
---|
54 | 54 | | technology if determined feasible and cost-effective. |
---|
55 | 55 | | (b) The commission shall implement, if feasible and |
---|
56 | 56 | | cost-effective, a risk scoring program for supplemental nutrition |
---|
57 | 57 | | assistance applications to streamline the eligibility |
---|
58 | 58 | | determination process, reduce errors, and strengthen fraud |
---|
59 | 59 | | detection. A risk scoring program implemented by the commission |
---|
60 | 60 | | must be capable of ranking applications based on complexity so |
---|
61 | 61 | | that: |
---|
62 | 62 | | (1) more experienced eligibility determination staff |
---|
63 | 63 | | members can be used to process more difficult cases and cases with |
---|
64 | 64 | | fraud characteristics; and |
---|
65 | 65 | | (2) applications ranked as low-risk on fraud |
---|
66 | 66 | | characteristics can be processed more expeditiously. |
---|
67 | 67 | | Sec. 33.054. WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT. The commission shall |
---|
68 | 68 | | improve its management of supplemental nutrition assistance |
---|
69 | 69 | | eligibility determination staff by: |
---|
70 | 70 | | (1) establishing clear performance expectations that |
---|
71 | 71 | | can serve as the basis for performance assessments; |
---|
72 | 72 | | (2) planning for anticipated staffing needs; |
---|
73 | 73 | | (3) revising policies regarding overtime and accrual |
---|
74 | 74 | | of compensatory time to ensure that eligibility determination staff |
---|
75 | 75 | | members have access to supervisors as necessary; |
---|
76 | 76 | | (4) assessing the effectiveness of training provided |
---|
77 | 77 | | to new eligibility determination staff members; and |
---|
78 | 78 | | (5) evaluating the compensation of eligibility |
---|
79 | 79 | | determination staff members to determine if the compensation is |
---|
80 | 80 | | sufficient to recruit qualified staff members and retain |
---|
81 | 81 | | experienced staff members. |
---|
82 | 82 | | Sec. 33.055. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT INFORMATION. (a) The |
---|
83 | 83 | | commission, in conjunction with state, regional, and local |
---|
84 | 84 | | eligibility determination offices, shall identify eligibility |
---|
85 | 85 | | determination program performance indicators with respect to which |
---|
86 | 86 | | data should periodically be collected. The commission shall |
---|
87 | 87 | | implement a process for collecting data on the identified |
---|
88 | 88 | | performance indicators. |
---|
89 | 89 | | (b) The commission shall provide periodic management |
---|
90 | 90 | | reports generated by the automated eligibility system to |
---|
91 | 91 | | eligibility determination offices. The reports must include |
---|
92 | 92 | | information regarding the number of pending supplemental nutrition |
---|
93 | 93 | | assistance applications and the number of those applications that |
---|
94 | 94 | | have not been processed within applicable timeliness standards. |
---|
95 | 95 | | (c) The commission shall use data collected under |
---|
96 | 96 | | Subsection (a) and the reports described by Subsection (b) to |
---|
97 | 97 | | develop and assess strategies for: |
---|
98 | 98 | | (1) streamlining the supplemental nutrition |
---|
99 | 99 | | assistance eligibility determination process; |
---|
100 | 100 | | (2) improving timeliness of eligibility |
---|
101 | 101 | | determinations; and |
---|
102 | 102 | | (3) accommodating increases in applications received. |
---|
103 | 103 | | SECTION 3. To the extent available for this purpose, the |
---|
104 | 104 | | Health and Human Services Commission shall use supplemental federal |
---|
105 | 105 | | funding provided for the administration of the supplemental |
---|
106 | 106 | | nutrition assistance program to implement Subchapter B, Chapter 33, |
---|
107 | 107 | | Human Resources Code, as added by this Act. |
---|
108 | 108 | | SECTION 4. This Act takes effect September 1, 2011. |
---|
109 | 109 | | * * * * * |
---|